Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 168532 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD SHAFEEK AND 2 OTHERS v. ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE 4TH DISTT. BAHRAICH AND 4 OTHERS

A227/6045/2025 · 2025-10-09

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6045 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed in the Court today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. The present petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "I. To set-aside the order dated 20.09.2025 passed by opposite party No. 1 i.e. Additional District and Session Judge 4th District Bahraich in criminal revision No. 300/2025 (Vahidul Hasan and others Vs. State of U.P. and others) the interest of justice. II. To direct the both parties shall maintain status-co during pendency of the case 1127/2025 computerkrit case No. T202508150301127 (Siraj Ahamd and others Vs. Vahidul Hasan and others) u/s 164/165 BNSS it interest of justice." 4. On being confronted after taking note of the fact that the order impugned dated 20.09.2025 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge-4th, District- Bahraich (in short "trial court") is simplicitor order of remand, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the present petition, without interfering in the impugned order, be disposed of finally with observation that the Magistrate concerned would conclude the proceedings expeditiously without being influenced by any of the observations made in the impugned order of remand dated 20.09.2025. 5. Taking note of the aforesaid statement of learned counsel for the petitioners, which has not been opposed by learned counsel for the side opposite, the present petition, without interfering in the impugned order, is disposed of finally with an observation that the Magistrate concerned would conclude the proceedings expeditiously without being influenced by any of the observations made in the impugned order of remand dated 20.09.2025. October 9, 2025 Arun/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Ashish Raman Mishra (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Mohammad Shafeek And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Addl. District And Session Judge 4th Distt. Bahraich And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench