Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010168242025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1826/2025 DHANBAR ALI AND 2 ORS SON OF LATE ASUGONI ALI R/O VIP ROAD, NEAR PRATIKSHA HOSPITAL, UPPAR BISHNU NAGAR, BORBARI, HENGRABARI, P.O. HENGRABARI, P.S. DISPUR, GUWAHATI-36, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:BABUL ALI S/O ABDUL MAJID R/O VIP ROAD NEAR PRATIKSHA HOSPITAL UPPAR BISHNU NAGAR BORBARI HENGRABARI P.O. HENGRABARI P.S. DISPUR GUWAHATI-36 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 3:SURIYA BEGUM D/O KHURSED ALI R/O VIP ROAD NEAR PRATIKSHA HOSPITAL UPPAR BISHNU NAGAR BORBARI HENGRABARI P.O. HENGRABARI Page No.# 2/3 P.S. DISPUR GUWAHATI-36 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A ALI, MS K TAYE,MS. M KHATUN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 08.09.2025 Heard Mr. A. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. R. R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. By this petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners, namely, (i) Dhanbar Ali (ii) Babul Ali (iii) Suriya Begum, have prayed for granting pre-arrest bail, apprehending arrest in connection with Dispur P.S. Case No. 631/2025, registered under Section 126(2)/117(2)/118(2)/351(2)/3(5) of BNS, 2023. 3. The allegation in the ejahar dated 25.07.2025 from which the incident arose, was lodged by informant Madhab Barman with the allegation that his neighbor Dhanbar Ali along with a group of people quarrelled with him and later on, he along with his brother-in-law and daughter assaulted the informant’s wife, leading to her hospitalization. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the same incident, the petitioner Dhanbar Ali has also lodged an ejahar before the Page No.# 3/3 Dispur police station with the allegation that the accused Madhab Barman and his wife restrained his wife and assaulted, leading to injury. It is also submitted that with the help of members of the public, both the families have been making efforts for an amicable settlement. 5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that investigation indicates that this is a case of marpit, where both sides stated to have sustained grievous injuries and the investigation also revealed grievous injuries of the informant caused by the petitioners. 6. Nevertheless, in the emerged and projected circumstances, I am of the considered opinion that the interim protection vide dated 01.08.2025 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions – that they shall co-operate with investigation and they shall not hamper or tamper with evidence. 7. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. 8. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant