JAHEEN AKHTAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/9957/2025 · 2025-10-10
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168522 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168522 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9957 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is seeking a direction upon the concerned authority i.e. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sultanpur to expedite the hearing of Claim Petition No.349 of 2019 (Mahreen Bano and others vs. National Education Institute and others) and decide the same within a time framed by this Court.
3. Upon a perusal of the record, it appears that the hearing of the aforesaid claim petition has been delayed inordinately and the progress has been tardy. Accordingly, the concerned authority i.e. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sultanpur is directed to expedite the hearing of the aforesaid claim petition and decide the same expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.
4. It is made clear that the court concerned will not grant any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties and if it is granted, the court concerned should impose costs for the same.
5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. October 10, 2025 Raj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Roshan Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Jaheen Akhtar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench