1 2025:CGHC:19105 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 2800 of 2025 1 - Karamat Shah S/o Fainuddin Shah Aged About 45 Years R/o Saitangartoli, Police Station-Lodam, District-Jashpur (C.G.) 2 - Zamir Khan S/o Ajmer Khan Aged About 34 Years R/o Saitangartoli, Police Station-Lodam, District-Jashpur (C.G.) ... Applicant versus State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House OfÏcer Of Police Station- Asta, District - Jashpur (C.G.) ... Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Sachin Nidhi, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 28.04.2025 1. The applicants have preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as they have been arrested in connection with Crime No. 08/2025, registered at Police Station – Asta, District - Jashpur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of C.G. Excise Act. 2. The case of the prosecution, is that the Police of Police Station – Asta, District - Jashpur (C.G.) has received a secret information through the informant and on the basis of such information the Police has seized a total of 17 liters of Mahua liquor from the possession of the present applicant. Thereafter, the applicant has been arrested by the Police and the offence was registered. RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 3. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case and there are 2 criminal antecedents registered against the present applicants under the CG Cattle Preservation Act and IPC, but there is no criminal antecedents of the applicants under the Excise Act. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed in this case. He further submits that under Section 34(2) of the Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years. The applicants are in jail since 23.02.2025 and trial is likely to take some time for its conclusion, therefore, he prays for grant of bail. 4. On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposes the bail application and submits that there are 2 criminal antecedents registered against the applicants, and the charge-sheet has been filed in this case. It is further submitted that a total of 17 liters of Mahua liquor has been seized from the possession of the present applicants, therefore, they are not entitled for grant of bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused all of the documents available on record. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and the fact that there are 2 criminal antecedents registered against the present applicants under the CG Cattle Preservation Act and IPC, but there is no criminal antecedents of the applicants under the Excise Act, charge- sheet has been filed against the applicants and they are in jail since 23.02.2025 and conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, I am inclined to allow this application. 3 7. Let applicants, Karamat Shah and Zamir Khan, involved in Crime No. 08/2025, registered at Police Station – Asta, District - Jashpur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of C.G. Excise Act, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufÏcient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufÏcient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. OfÏce is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar