Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 168519 (ALL)

IZAD ALIAS AZAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

BAIL/9645/2025 · 2025-10-09

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9645 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.378 of 2024, under Sections 103(2), 238, 61(2) BNS, P.S. Pali, District Hardoi. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that on the same allegations the co-accused Shahnoor and Maynoor@Sharukh have been enlarged on bail vide orders dated 27.5.2025 and 18.8.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 4681 of 2025 and Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 7473 of 2025 respectively, copies of which are collectively annexed as annexure 9 to the bail application. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the allegations against the applicant which is similar to the co accused, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 20.11.2024 and having no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Izad Alias Azad be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Indrapal Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Izad Alias Azad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 9, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 9645 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench