RAM JIVAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/9507/2025 · 2025-10-07
Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168512 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168512 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9507 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned AGA for the State.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party no. 4 is hereby dispensed with.
3. By means of this petition, the petitioner has assailed the impugned FIR, however, after arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the petitioner may be given liberty to file anticipatory bail application before the competent Court and direction may be issued to decide the same with expedition.
4. Therefore, without entering into the merits of the issue and considering the aforesaid innocuous request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, we hereby dispose of this petition at the admission stage, giving liberty to the petitioner to file an anticipatory bail application before the competent Court within a period of two weeks and if such application is filed, the same may be heard and disposed of on its own merits with expedition. October 7, 2025 Anurag Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gulam Mustafa Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Ram Jivan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench