Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16851 (AP)

B BALAKRISHNA REDDY v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/14872/2020 · 2025-09-09

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010225442020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14872/2020 Between: 1. B BALAKRISHNA REDDY, S/O B VENKATARAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. SECRETARY-CUM CORRESPONDENT OF BHARATH EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, R/O. I ).NO. II-282-A-13-2, P 85T COLONY, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT), SECRETRIAT, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MUDIVEDU POLICE STATION, MUDIVEDU, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. N NIRUPA LATHA, W/O. N VENKATARAMANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O.D.NO. 1-9, OPP. BHARAT FUNCTION HALL, ANGALLU, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. N VENKATARAMANA REDDY, S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. D.NO 1-9, OPP. BHARAT FUNCTION HALL ANGALLU. MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. B SADASIVA REDDY, S/O B.NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.580, BALAJI COLONY, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. M SUDHAKAR, S/O SUBBANNA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O.D NO 15 5-7 2 AL, REDDEPPA NAIDU COLONY (RRN COLONY), MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 9. A VIJAYALAKSHMI, W/O A.SIVARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.1-542, AMMINENI STREET, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 10. P SANKARA, S/O UTHANNA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. D NO 1-262, MBT ROAD ANGALLU MADANAPALLE CHITTOOR DISTRICT 11. T VAMSI KRISHNA REDDY, S/O RATHNAKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/O. D.NO 8/13, CHILAKAMPALIVANDLA 2 PALLE VEERABALI VILLAGE, RAYACHOTY, KADAPA DISTRICT 12. LOKESWARA REDDY, S/O. VCNKATA SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O. D NO 1/62/13, PENDEKANTI NAGAR BANAGANAPALLE KURNOOL DISTRICT. 13. P MANI, S/O VENKATARAMANA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O. 1).NO.7/17, PUJARIVANDLAPALLI, THETTU KURABALAKOTA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 14. G BHASKAR REDDY, S/O KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O.D.NO 1/18, VEERLADINNE DOMMALADINNE, KOWTHALARN KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PANUKU RAJESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in not registering the FIR against the Respondent Nos. 5 to 14 in spite of the petitioner's oral and written complaint dated 05-03-2020 and inspite of sending the complaint through post to the Respondent Nos.2 AND 3 and further on several requests and Personal approaches of the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, improper, and unconstitutional and against the procedure contemplated under the code of criminal procedure and consequently direct the Respondent No. 4 to Register the FIR against the Respondents 5 to 14 basing on the written complaint dated 05-03-2020 lodged by the petitioner and sent through post and take action as per the procedure contemplated under law and to file final report forthwith as per the law and also procedure contemplated under the code of criminal procedure.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the Respondent – Police have not received any complaint from the Petitioner. 3 3. Sri P.Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of and liberty may be given to the Petitioner to make fresh representation. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the Petitioner to make fresh representation. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:10.09.2025 Dinesh 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.14872 of 2020 Dt.10.09.2025 Dinesh