Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 168501 (ALL)

MAHESH TRIPATHI THRU. HIS WIFE ARCHANA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. LAW GOVT. LKO. AND OTHERS

HABC/368/2025 · 2025-09-26

Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 368 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard Mr. Mayankar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. G. D. Bhatt, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents. 2. This matter has been taken up on the mention being made in the morning today on the point that the petitioner has been illegally apprehended by the police officers/ police officials of Police Station- Balrampur. 3. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed the following main relief(s): "(i) Issue a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus commanding the respondent no. 1 to 5 to produce the petitioner/detenue before this Hon'ble Court. (ii) To direct that the petitioner be set at liberty forthwith. (iii) To set a high level inquiry in the matter so that the guilty police officers liable for the illegal confinement of the petitioner since 19-09- 2025 are framed and punished as per the law of land." 4. Learned A.G.A. has produced the copy of instructions letter dated 25.09.2025 provided by Inspector In-charge, Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District- Balrampur, which is taken on record. As per the aforesaid instructions, the accused Mahesh Tripathi, petitioner herein, has been arrested on 25.09.2025 at 07:05 hours and has been sent to the judicial custody on 25.09.2025 itself and presently he is in judicial custody in Balrampur jail. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mayankar Singh, Neeraj Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mahesh Tripathi Thru. His Wife Archana Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Law Govt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 5. In the wake of aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this writ petition, therefore, the writ petition is consigned to records. 6. However, it is always open for the petitioner/ wife of the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy before the appropriate court of law, if he/ she is so advised. September 26, 2025 (Manoj K.) HABC No. 368 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench