Vinay Kumar v. STATE OF U.P. THRU ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE LUCKNOW AND ORS.
WRIC/9795/2025 · 2025-10-09
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168486 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168486 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9795 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Sri Pramod Kumar Shukla, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, upon reconsideration, submits that the present writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate court for redressal of his grievance.
2. In light of the submission made above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. October 9, 2025 Raj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramod Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ram Kumar Singh (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Vinay Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench