Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 168468 (ALL)

NEERAJ @ NEERAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER

BAIL/11927/2024 · 2025-08-12

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47164 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11927 of 2024 Applicant :- Neeraj @ Neeraj Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shantanu Pandey,Manoj Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Shri Suraj Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Satyendra Srivastava, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.257 of 2024 under Sections 115(2), 352, 140(1), 190, 191(2) of B.N.S. registered at Police Station- Talgaon, District- Sitapur. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged against four persons, including the applicant, stating that all the accused persons had abused and beaten up the informant and some other persons and they have forcibly taken away one Ram Bharose with them. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is a young man aged 22 years having no criminal history and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that co- accused persons Lalu Yadav and Ankit @ Maan Singh have been granted bail by means of orders dated 18.07.2025 and 05.06.2025 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Crl. Misc. Bail Application Nos.3681 of 2025 and 5068 of 2025. 6. The State has filed a counter affidavit annexing therewith material collected during investigation and a copy of charge- sheet dated 07.09.2024. 7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the FIR levels similar allegations against all the accused persons; two co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail; that the applicant is a young man having no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 11.07.2024 whereas the investigation stands concluded, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9. Let the applicant- Neeraj @ Neeraj Kumar be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. . [Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] Order Date :- 12.8.2025/-Amit K- Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench