SAURABH MISHRA @ MONU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER
NA528/1449/2025 · 2025-10-09
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168442 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168442 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1449 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri B.B. Mishra, Advocate on behalf of respondent no. 2 is taken on reocrd. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as learned counsel for respondent no. 2 and perused the record. 3. The present application has been filed with a prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 30.11.2024 as well as cognizance order dated 01.04.2025 passed in S.T. No. 62 of 2025 arising out of F.I.R. No. 468 of 2024, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) B.N.S. and Sections 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act, P.S. Ishanagar, District Kheri as well as its entire proceedings. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and a compromise has been arrived between them on 24.09.2025 (appended as Annexure No. 5 to the application). 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the court below, before which, the case is pending. Therefore, the compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the court below itself. 6. Accordingly, the application is disposed of with direction to the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dr. Surendra Kumar Misra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Saurabh Mishra @ Monu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notice to all its signatories requiring their personal presence and thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court concerned and the compromise will be made part of the record. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 7. For a period of six weeks or till the verification of the compromise, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. 8. Registry is directed to hand over the original copy of the compromise to the learned counsel for the applicants after retaining photocopy of the same.
October 9, 2025 VKS NA528 No. 1449 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench