HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5995 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondent is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1-Additioal Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide interim relief application pending in revision No.575/2025, computerized case No.C-202504000000575 namely Ganga Devi Vs. Ram Magan, under Section 219 of L.R. Act, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1-Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya is directed to decide interim relief application pending in revision No.575/2025, computerized case No.C-202504000000575 namely Ganga Devi Vs. Ram Magan, under Section 219 of L.R. Act, expeditiously, say within a period of six weeks from the date of service of notice on the respondents in accordance with law and in case the application for interim relief cannot be decided, it shall be open for the petitioner to press ad-interim relief which the appellate authority shall consider and decide, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ganga Devi Verma @ Ganga Devi .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Another .....Respondent(s) circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 26, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 5995 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench