SMT.SONA DEVI MAURYA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. REVENUE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
A227/5991/2025 · 2025-10-07
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5991 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. Sri S.K. Upadhyay, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the trial court had issued notice to the defendant which stands served, but there is no averment to this effect in the petition, as such, he does not want to press the petition at this stage. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. Let certified copies of the orders annexed with the petition be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining their photocopy on record. . October 7, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Kumar Upadhyay, Akanksha Mourya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Smt.Sona Devi Maurya And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench