2025:UHC:10399 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA2 / 2 8 5 / 2 0 2 5 Hon 'ble Rak esh Th apliy al, J. 1. Mr. Basant Singh, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. This is second bail application moved on behalf of the applicant Mang Singh @ Mangu seeking bail in relation to FIR dated 22.02.2025, bearing FIR No. 0008 of 2025, registered at P.S. Reethasahib, District Champawat wherein the present applicant along with one Kuldeep Joshi has been implicated for the offence punishable under Section 2/ 3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986. 4. The first bail application BA1 No. 1075 of 2025 was converted into short term bail and the applicant was granted short term bail, and, thereafter, he has surrendered and now move this second bail application. 5. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that on the basis of the case, the reference of which has been in the paragraph 11, the applicant has been implicated under the Gangsters Act, though, in most of the case the applicant is already bailed out. He further submits that the applicant’s daughter is suffering from heart disease and his wife is no more and there is no one to look after his daughter. He further submits that earlier the short term bail granted to the accused was never been misused and he is languishing in jail since 25.09.2025. He further submits that the co-accused, namely, Kuldeep Joshi who has a criminal history of eight cases has already been enlarged on bail by this Court. 2025:UHC:10399 6. On the other side, Mr. Sandhu, learned Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State has not disputed this fact that the applicant in most of the cases is already bailed out. 7. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that in the previous cases the applicant is already bailed out, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant Mang Singh @ Mangu be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. ( Rak esh Th apliyal, J.) 1 9 .1 1 .2 0 2 5 Parul 2025:UHC:10399