ABHISHEK SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/8527/2025 · 2025-09-26
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168407 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168407 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8527 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
Heard, Shri Durgendra Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The instant application has been filed with the prayer to quash the impugned non bailable warrant dated 10.03.2022 issued by learned additional session judge court no. 5 in S.T. NO. 445/2015 State Vs. Akhilesh Tiwari and others arising out of case crime no. 176/2015 under section 302/34/120B I.P.C. P.S. Kadipur District Sultanpur as well as further proceeding of the aforesaid case pending before learned court below only against the petitioner as contained in Annexure no. 1 to this petition in the interest of justice. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant due to unavoidable circumstances, the applicant could not appear before the trial court and he undertakes that he will appeal on each and every date fixed as and when is required in future. The learned counsel for the State has refuted the aforesaid contention. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the parties, particularly, with the fact the non-bailable warrant is issued for preparing the presence of the accused/ applicant himself has undertaken that he will remain present before the trial court on the date fixed in future, therefore, the non-bailable warrant dated 10.03.2022 is hereby kept in abeyance. The applicant is directed to appear before the trial court on the next date fixed and he will keep on appearing on each and every date fixed by the trial court and will not remain absent without an application written in writing with a cogent reason, failing which the trial court is at liberty to proceed in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observation, the present application is disposed of. September 26, 2025 Haseen U. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Durgendra Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Abhishek Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench