HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5984 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Sri Shikhar Anand, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no. 1. Sri Neerav Chitravanshi, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his Case bearing Claim Petition No. 882 of 2019 (Daya Ram Verma V. U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and Others filed under Section 4 of the U.P. Public Service Tribunal Act, 1976 pending before the respondent No.1. It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the matter has not yet been decided. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Learned standing counsel has drawn the attention of the Court to the extract of the order-sheet and has pointed out that in majority of the dates, the proceedings before the respondent No.1 could not advance on account of the resolution passed by the Members of the Bar abstaining from judicial work. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deo Raj Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shikhar Anand, C.S.C., Neerav Chitravanshi Daya Ram Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Public Services Tribunal Indira Bhawan Lko. Thru. Chairman And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.2 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Case bearing Claim Petition No. 882 of 2019 (Daya Ram Verma V. U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and Others filed under Section 4 of the U.P. Public Service Tribunal Act, 1976 pending before the respondent No.1 most expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall consider and decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. September 26, 2025 Asheesh A227 No. 5984 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHEESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench