Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16838 (UTT)

VEER SINGH AND ANR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/448/2025 · 2025-12-13

Daily Lok Adalat

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS C-528 No.448 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Ms. Manju Bahuguna, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned AGA for the State. Mr. Mohit Kumar Kashyap, learned counsel for the private respondent. The case is taken up today before the National Lok Adalat. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking quashing of the cognizance and summoning order dated 22.10.2024 passed by the Judicial Magistrate IInd, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar, in Criminal Case No. 3470 of 2024, State vs. Shyam Singh @ Panchu Singh and others, for the offences punishable under Sections 427 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Dineshpur, District Udham Singh Nagar. Before the Lok Adalat, the parties are present before the Court and have amicably settled the dispute. It is submitted that, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, respondent no. 2, namely Kundan Singh Mehta, does not wish to press Criminal Case No. 3470 of 2024, State vs. Shyam Singh @ Panchu Singh and others, pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate IInd, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar, and has no objection if the same is quashed. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the application stands dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, Criminal Case No. 3470 of 2024, State vs. Shyam Singh @ Panchu Singh and others, for the offences punishable under Sections 427 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, pending before the Judicial Magistrate Second, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar, is hereby quashed on the basis of the compromise. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. The terms of the compromise have been recorded in a separate compromise sheet, which shall form part of this order. (Alok Mahra, J.) 13.12.2025 BS