HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11824 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for opposite parties. 2. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided. 3. The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to provide the duty to the petitioner on the post of PRD (Prantiya Rakshak Dal) and pay honorarium as is being paid to the other members of the Prantiya Rakshak Dal. 4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the reliefs sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.2 i.e. Director General Provincial Guard Team/ Development Team and Youth Welfare, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Counsel for the respondents has no objection. 5. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.2 then respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and the relevant rules within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Arun Kumar Giri .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) representation along with certified copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. October 9, 2025 lakshman WRIA No. 11824 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench