Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 168350 (ALL)

RAVI KANT YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/9787/2025 · 2025-10-09

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9787 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief(s):- "(i) issue an appropriate order or direction to the learned Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority, Lucknow, i.e., the opposite party no. 4 in the present petition, to expeditiously proceed with and decide the execution filed before it for implementing and effectuating the award dated 08.09.2015, passed by the opposite party no. 3, as supplemented, amended, or modified, as the case may be, by the judgment dated 26.04.2024, passed by the opposite party no. 4 in Reference Case No. 529 of 2023 (Ravikant and another vs. State of U.P. and another), within such time as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court, and to grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the ends of justice," 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that for raising their grievances the petitioners have filed the aforesaid execution application before the respondent authority, however, the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No. 4 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the execution application of the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No. 4/Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Asit Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ravi Kant Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) and Resettlement Authority, Lucknow is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid execution application of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 9, 2025 Raj WRIC No. 9787 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench