TEJU MALI SON OF MOHAR SINGH MALI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/2491/2025 · 2025-04-30
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16835 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16835 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:18262] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2491/2025
1. Teju Mali Son Of Mohar Singh Mali, Resident Of 235 In Front Of Khadi Bhandar, Karauli, Tehsil And District Karauli (Rajasthan).
2. Sanjana Saini Wife Of Teju Mali Daughter Of Bablu Saini, Bamanpura Karsaie, District Karauli, Presently Resident Of 235 In Front Of Khadi Bhandar, Karauli, Tehsil And District Karauli (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Bablu Mali Son Of Late Raghunath Prasad, Resident Of Bamanpura Karsaie, Police Station, Mamchari, District Karauli Presently Resident Of Near Petrol Pump, Old Truck Union, Karauli, Police Station, Kotwali Karauli, District Karauli (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta with Mr. Lokendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 30/04/2025 In compliance of the directions passed in the erstwhile order, petitioner Nos.1 & 2 have marked their presence before this Court. Parties present in Court have submitted that they have solemnized their marriage on 07.03.2025. In support of the same, reliance is placed upon Annexure-5. It is further submitted that they are major in terms of age. Further, it is submitted that contents of the FIR No.50/2025 dated 11.03.2025 are false and
[2025:RJ-JP:18262] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2491/2025] fabricated and allegation of kidnapping is not tenable. Therefore, same needs to be quashed. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case, taking note of the fact that respective parties i.e. petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 are major in terms of age and they have solemnized their marriage on 07.03.2025, this Court deems it apposite to quash the impugned FIR dated 11.03.2025. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.50/2025 dated 11.03.2025 is hereby quashed and set aside. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/42