HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1051 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. Though the petition is ostensibly filed in public interest, the petitioner has not made due disclosure as required by sub-rule (3A) of Rule 1 of Chapter XXII of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 which was amended in view of judgement of the Supreme Court in State of Uttaranchal vs. Balwant Singh Chaufal and others, reported in 2010 AIR SCW 1029. 3. Hence, we decline to entertain the petition since we are not satisfied in regard to the bona fides and credentials of the petitioner. 4. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to file a fresh petition after making required disclosures, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs. September 26, 2025 Jaideep/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Salahuddin Khan, Sanjeev Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ashish Chaturvedi, Patanjali Chaturvedi (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Sheelendra Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Urban Development Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JAIDEEP BANERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- JAIDEEP BANERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench