Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 168333 (ALL)

RASHMI SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND NUTRITION LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/11815/2025 · 2025-10-09

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11815 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for the opposite parties. 2. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to authority concerned for consideration of the petitioner for promotion on the post of Class III in terms of the Service Regulations. 3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Director, Bal Vikas Seva Evam Pusthahar, Indira Bhawan, Lucknow, who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. October 9, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manendra Nath Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Rashmi Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Child Development And Nutrition Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench