Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16832 (JHR)

SANJAY HAZRA ALIAS SANJAY HAJRA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5360/2025 · 2025-08-08

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- ( 2025:JHHC:22750 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5360 of 2025 Sanjay Hazra @ Sanjay Hajra, aged about 30 years, son of Balram Hazra, resident of Village- Chatro, P.O.- Chatro, P.S.- Deori, District- Giridih. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …. Opp. Party With B. A. No. 5969 of 2025 Md. Mojaffar @ Md. Mojafar, aged about 24 years, son of Md. Mukhtar Alam @ Kismat Ansari, resident of Village- Manpur, P.O.- Pihra, P.S.- Gawan, District- Giridih. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …. Opp. Party With B. A. No. 6521 of 2025 Raj Kumar Verma, aged about 28 years, son of Rameshwar Mahto, resident of Village- Berahadi, P.O.- Siyatand, P.S.- Jamua, District- Giridih. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …. Opp. Party ------ CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajendra Krishna, Advocate Ms. Priya Sahay, Advocate Mr. Aayush Avant Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Shubham Mayank, Advocate Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate Mr. Shree Nivas Roy, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Saket Kumar, AAPP Ms. Ruby Pandey, APP Mr. Naveen Kumar Gaunjhu, APP For the Informant : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate Mr. Sudhir Kumar Roy, Advocate ----- 3/ 08.08.2025 Since, all these bail applications arise out of the same police case, they are heard together and are being disposed of by a common order. 2. Heard the parties. 3. Petitioners have been made accused in connection with Deori -1- P.S. Case No. 40 of 2024 for the offences under Sections 363, 365, 386, 387, 364A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and cognizance has been taken under Sections 364A, 467, 468, 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of Ms. Nikhat Ayesha, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Giridih. 4. Prayer for bail of these petitioners was earlier rejected by this Court vide B.A. Nos. 8527 of 2024, B.A. No. 10089 of 2024 and B.A. No. 10910 of 2024 by common order dated 13.01.2025, at this stage. 5. The son of the informant, namely, Pawan Kumar Das, was abducted for ransom and after two days, he was rescued. It appears that the petitioners were identified in test identification parade by the victim as his abductors. 6. The report regarding the stage of trial, earlier called for, has been received. It appears that the case is fixed on the point of charge. 7. Mr. Mahesh Tewari, learned counsel appearing for the informant has submitted that now charge has been framed and one witness has been examined. 8. Considering the fact that the victim has been rescued and the trial has commenced just now, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Ms. Nikhat Ayesha, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Giridih, in connection with Deori P.S. Case No. 40 of 2024. (Ambuj Nath, J.) R.Kr. -2-