HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11801 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Shankar Lal, learned counsel for respondent no. 3, learned counsel for the State and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following reliefs:- "1. Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party No-2&3 to ensure payment of post retiral dues as well as pending arrears of salary including increments to the petitioner within stipulated period which could to be paid to him due to financial crunch of Dugdh Sangh, in the interest of justice. 2. Issue a writ or order in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party No-2 i.e. Milk Commissioner, Dairy Development Department UP Jawahar Bhawan Lucknow to consider and decide the claim of petitioner with regard to payment of post dues as well arrears of salary within stipulated period, in the interest of justice. 3. Issue any other writ or direction, as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. 4. Allow the writ petition with cost." It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a retired employee and dues have not been paid yet. He submitted that he has submitted certain representations, but those are unheard. He submits that he may be given liberty to move a fresh representation before the respondent no. 2, within a period of 15 days and the same may be directed to be decided within time fixed. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, Jainendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shanker Lal Ajay Kumar Gupta .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dairy Development Deptt. Lucknow And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Learned counsel for the respondents do not oppose the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation while raising his claim before the respondent no. 2 within the period of 15 days and if such representation is moved, the respondent no. 2 is directed to consider and decide the same, within further period of two months, in accordance with law and also if the respondent no. 2 reaches to the conclusion regarding the dues to be paid, he shall pay the same. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. October 9, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 11801 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench