BILAL AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/9458/2025 · 2025-10-07
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168301 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168301 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9458 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. As per the prosecution case, the applicant was arrested on the information given by the Mukhbir Khas, and from his right pocket two tin bombs and from left pocket two tin bombs were recovered which were defused in a bucket of water. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to enmity. Infact, the recovery shown in the recovery memo is false, which is evident from the arrest memo of the applicant which shows that there is no recovery from the applicant. The arrest memo is annexed as Annexure No. 3 to the affidavit filed alongwith the bail application and the chargesheet has already been filed. 4. It is further submitted that the applicant has criminal history of 11 cases, which has been explained by the learned counsel for the applicant in paragraph-7 of the affidavit filed alongwith the bail application and there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away after being released from jail or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. 6. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, the fact that in the arrest memo, no recovery has been shown from the applicant, the applicant is in jail since 29.05.2025, the fact that chargesheet has already been filed, this Court finds it to be a fit case for granting bail to the applicant. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Atiya Abid Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Bilal Ahmad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 8.
Let the applicant Bilal Ahmad involved in Case Crime/FIR No. 0098/2025, Under Sections- 4/5 Explosive Substance Act, Police Station- Manikpur, District- Pratapgarh, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him in accordance with law. (vi) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. (now Section 84 BNSS) is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law under Section 174-A IPC (now Section 209 of BNS). 9. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. October 7, 2025 DiVYa BAIL No. 9458 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench