RAM SAHAY JAISWAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/5974/2025 · 2025-09-26
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168285 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168285 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5974 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Abhishek Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Gonda Sadar, District - Gonda, to decide Case No. 13491 of 2018 (Computerized Case No. T 201808300413491) - Gaon Sabha Vs. Ram Sahay and Others, U/S 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Gonda Sadar, District - Gonda, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 2 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Gonda Sadar, District - Gonda, is directed to decide Case No. 13491 of 2018 (Computerized Case No. T 201808300413491) - Gaon Sabha Vs. Ram Sahay and Others, U/S 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
September 26, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Kumar Mishra, Vineet Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Alok Mathur,J.) Ram Sahay Jaiswal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench