HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8529 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1 By means of the instant applicant, the applicant has prayed that this Court may be pleased to direct the learned Court below not to insist the petitioner to file separate sureties and bonds in each and every three cases and accept only two sureties and one personal bond in lieu of all the cases. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that it has become impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties and bonds in each of cases, in which, he has been granted bail. He added that the applicant has been granted bail in three cases arising out of following Case Crime Numbers :- 1. Crime No. 302/2023 under section 379/411/413/420/467/468/ 471 IPC P.S. Madiaon, District- Lucknow; 2. Crime No. 296/2023 under section 379/411/413/420/467/468/ 471 IPC P.S. Madiaon, District- Lucknow; 3. Crime No. 288/2023 under section 379/411/413 IPC P.S. Madiaon, District- Lucknow; 4. Crime No. 125/2018 under section 379/411 IPC P.S. Vibhuti Khand, District- Lucknow; 5. Crime No. 70/2023 under section 379/411 IPC P.S. Husainganj, District- Lucknow; 6. Crime No. 77/2023 under section 379/411 IPC P.S. Qaiserbagh, District- Lucknow; 7. Crime No.177/2023 under section 379/411 IPC P.S. Aliganj, District- Lucknow; 8. Crime No. 399/2023 under section 379/411/420/467/468/471 IPC P.S. PGI, District- Lucknow; 9. Crime No. 188/2023 under section 379/411 IPC P.S. Godamba, District- Lucknow; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohammad Alishah Faruqi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shanu @ Zuaib .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s) 10. Crime No. 163/2023 under section 379/411 IPC P.S. Cantt, District- Lucknow; 11. Crime No. 295/2023 U/s379/411/413/420/467/468/471 IPCP.S. Madiaon, District- Lucknow; 12. Crime No- 206/2024, U/S- 3 (1) U.P. Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, at P.S Madiaon, Lucknow. 3. He next added that despite the Trial Court granted the bail in aforesaid matters, the applicant is still in jail. Being poor person, he is unable to produce the sureties in each cases. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018] the Supreme Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioner to submit separate personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 4. Referring the aforesaid judgement and order, he submits that the applicant may also be given the benefit of the ratio of the judgement passed in Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (supra). 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed off with a direction to the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. September 26, 2025 Haseen U. A482 No. 8529 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench