RAM ASREY AND ANOTHER v. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TEHSIL KADIPUR, SULTANPUR AND OTHERS
A227/5958/2025 · 2025-09-26
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168262 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168262 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5958 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 -Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Kadipur, District Sultanpur to decide application dated 7.9.2025 under Sections 22, 23 and 227 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 filed in Case No.134 of 2001 (Ram Asrey and Others Vs. Chauthi and others) under Section 41 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Kadipur, District Sultanpur is directed to decide application dated 7.9.2025 under Sections 22, 23 and 227 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 filed in Case No.134 of 2001 (Ram Asrey and Others Vs. Chauthi and others) under Section 41 of U.P. Land Revenue Act expeditiously, say within a period of six months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Shukla, Anshu Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Ram Asrey And Another .....Petitioner(s) Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Kadipur, Sultanpur And Others .....Respondent(s)
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 26, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 5958 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench