SHAMIM KHAN v. STTAE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SACHIVALAYA PRASHASAN LKO. AND ANOTHER
WRIA/11757/2025 · 2025-10-09
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168259 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168259 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11757 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for the opposite parties.
2. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to authority concerned to consider petitioner's case for grant of Family Pension since she is covered under Rules 3 and 7 of U.P. Retirement Benefit Rules, 1961 as also as per recommendations of Pay Commission U.P. - 2008. 3.Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is unmarried sister of Cyril Iqbal Khan who has expired without any dependents apart from petitioner.
4. Since consider of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
5. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. October 9, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ranvijay Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Shamim Khan .....Petitioner(s) Sttae Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Sachivalaya Prashasan Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench