MEENA DWIVEDI v. NAYAB TEHSILDAR JAHAGIRGANJ, TEHSIL ALAPUR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND 4 OTHERS
A227/5996/2025 · 2025-09-26
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168249 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168249 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5996 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2.In light of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1- Nayab TEhsildar, Jahagirganj, Tehsil Alapur, District Ambedkar Nagar to decide case No. 2793 of 2023, computerized case No.T202304040402793 under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code tilted as Meena Dwivedi Vs. Kaushilya, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 - Nayab Tehsildar, Jahagirganj, Tehsil Alapur, District Ambedkar Nagar is desired to make all endeavor to decide mutation case No. 2793 of 2023, computerized case No.T202304040402793 under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code tilted as Meena Dwivedi Vs. Kaushilya expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar, Arvind Kumar Mishra, Sushant Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Meena Dwivedi .....Petitioner(s) Nayab Tehsildar Jahagirganj, Tehsil Alapur, Ambedkar Nagar And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 26, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 5996 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench