Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 168241 (ALL)

NISHAHUDDEEN BAIG v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. BASIC EDUCATION LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/11778/2025 · 2025-09-26

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11778 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no. 1 & 4. Shri Rakesh Kumar Chaudhry has accepted notice on behalf of respondents no. 2 & 3 and Shri Prashant Kumar Singh has accepted notice on behalf of respondents no. 5 and 6. 2. There is consensus at the bar that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court passed in Writ-A No.9925 of 2025 in re: Dr. Sandeep Shukla and 3 others vs. State of U.P. and others, decided on 01.09.2025. 3. Accordingly taking into consideration the aforesaid consensus, the present petition is disposed of in light of the aforesaid judgment passed in the case of Dr. Sandeep Shukla (supra). 4. It is provided that the petitioners would also be entitled for the benefit of the judgment of Dr. Sandeep Shukla (supra). September 26, 2025 J. K. Dinkar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramod Kumar Pandey, Prashant Sharma, Sanjay Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Prashant Kumar Singh, Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Nishahuddeen Baig .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Basic Education Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench