HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5962 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Anubhav Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondent is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Additional Commissioner (Administration), Devi Patan Division, Gonda, to decide Recall Application dated 04.08.2025, for recall of order dated 11.11.2024, passed i Revision bearing Computerized Case No. C 202408000001577 - Wali Mohammad @ Mohammad Aslam Vs. Kaisrun Nisha and Others, U/S 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioners would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner (Administration), Devi Patan Division, Gonda, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to approach the Court concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of Recall Application dated 04.08.2025, for recall of order dated 11.11.2024, passed i Revision bearing Computerized Case No. C 202408000001577 - Wali Mohammad @ Mohammad Aslam Vs. Kaisrun Nisha and Others, U/S 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the Court/Authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioners, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the Court concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. September 26, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anubhav Dwivedi, Smt.Seema Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Smt. Kaisrun Nisha And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner, Add., Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench