Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16822 (ALL)

RAVI KAMAL BHARGAVA v. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER

WRIC/3912/2025 · 2025-03-02

Shekhar B Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:29771-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3912 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ravi Kamal Bhargava Respondent :- The State Of Uttar Pradesh And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Raghav Dev Garg Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. 1. Heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent authorities in renewing the lease deed dated June 1, 1953 executed in favour of petitioner's mother. 3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in above regard, the petitioner has already submitted a representation to the District Magistrate, Prayagraj on July 29, 2024 but no decision action has yet been taken. He prays that the aforesaid representation of the petitioner may be directed to be decided expeditiously. 4. Upon hearing the counsel appearing on behalf of the parties and perusing the record, we are of the view that the prayer of the petitioner is innocuous and may be granted. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.2, being the District Magistrate, Prayagraj, is directed to consider and take a decision on the representation of the petitioner dated July 29, 2024 in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from date. An opportunity of hearing should be granted to the petitioner before passing a reasoned order. 6. With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 3.3.2025 Rakesh (Vipin Chandra Dixit, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH MEHTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad