ROJ ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. FOREST DEPTT. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/9794/2025 · 2025-10-09
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168215 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168215 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9794 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent(s) in deciding the application dated March 26, 2025 filed by the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that for raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid application before the respondent authority, however, the same has not yet been decided.
4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent authority should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the application of the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the respondent No.2/ Divisional Forest Officer, Sohelwa Wiled Division, Balrampur is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid application of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kunwar Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Roj Ali .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Forest Deptt. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
hearing to the petitioner.
6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 9, 2025 Raj WRIC No. 9794 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench