HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8470 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings of the entire proceedings in respect to the petitioners of the Case No. 11646/2024 and impugned summoning order dated 13.09.2024 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ayodhya, by means of which the petitioners have summoned and Charge Sheet No.01 of 2024 dated 24.02.2024 arising out from the FIR/Case Crime no..714/2023, Under Sections U/S-323,504,506,308 I.P.C. Police Station- Kotwali Ayodhya, District-Ayodhya, State versus Neeraj Sharma and others. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. The applicants have not committed alleged offence. 4. On the other hand, learned AGA has submitted that prima facie, the offence is made out against the applicants. It is further submitted that these are disputed questions of fact, which can be adjudicated only after adducing the evidence. He further controverts the submissions of learned counsel for the applicants on the ground that this is not a stage where minute and meticulous exercise with regard to the appreciation of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Uday Pratap Singh, Vaibhav Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramesh Sharma And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) evidence may be done and truthfulness of the allegations could only be tested in a criminal trial and, therefore, the application is misconceived and liable to be dismissed. 5. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that they do not want to press the application and seek liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 SCC 51. 6. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. 7. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (supra). 9. The application is disposed off accordingly. September 26, 2025 Anuj Singh A482 No. 8470 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench