Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 168182 (ALL)

SUNEEL KUMAR VERMA AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WPIL/1044/2025 · 2025-10-09

Subhash Vidyarthi

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1044 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Sanjai Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner sand Shri Anil Kumar Kushwaha, the learned State Counsel. 2. By means of the instant petition filed in public interest, five petitioners have approached this Court seeking a direction to the respondent Nos.1 to 5 for taking action against the respondent No.6 - Matra Bhumi Creation Private Ltd. through Director Ajai Singh, who has purchased the land bearing gata no.2296 Kha Minjumla measuring 0.253 Hectares situated in Village- Salempur, Pargana and Tehsil Mohanlalganj, District- Lucknow for a person belonging to Scheduled Caste without obtaining requisite permission. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the respondent No.6 is Bhoo Mafia against whom the petitioners have no private grudge and the petition has been filed in public interest. 4. In response to a question put by the Court as to who has declared the respondent No.6 to be a Bhoo Mafia, the learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that this declaration has not been made by any authority and he himself has turned the respondent No.6 as a Bhoo Mafia. 5. On the basis of written instructions provided by Tehsildar- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjai Kumar Singh, Nilay Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Suneel Kumar Verma And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Mohanlalganj, the learned State Counsel has informed that a case under Section 209 (H) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 bearing computerized No.E-202510460346096 has already been instituted. The matter is subjudice and it could be decided expeditiously on its merits. 6. As the matter is already subjudice, no interference is warranted in this public interest litigation which is dismissed accordingly. October 9, 2025 -Amit K- WPIL No. 1044 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench