Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 168167 (ALL)

NAIM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR/DIST. MAGISTRATE BALRAMPUR AND 5 OTHERS

WPIL/1043/2025 · 2025-10-09

Subhash Vidyarthi

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1043 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Ajay Kumar Pandey, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Anil Kumar Kushwaha, the learned Standing Counsel for the State of U.P., Shri Pankaj Gupta, the learned counsel for the gaon sabha and Shri Mohd. Ali, the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.4 and 6. 2. By means of the instant petition filed in public interest, the petitioner has sought issuance ofa direction to the respondent Nos.1 to 3 to remove encroachment made over land bearing Gata No.516 measuring 0.097 Hectare situated in Village Manki, Pargana and Tehsil Tulsipur, District- Balrampur, which is recorded as Rasta. 3. On the basis of written instructions provided to him, the learned counsel for the State informed the Court that upon inspection, encroachment was found on the spot and proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code have already been instituted. 4. In view of the statutory proceedings already having been instituted for redressal of the grievance of the petitioner, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant petition which is disposed of accordingly by observing that proceedings instituted under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code 2006 shall be disposed of in accordance with law expeditiously. October 9, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Naim .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Collector/Dist. Magistrate Balrampur And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench