Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 168153 (ALL)

MAHENDRA BAHADUR SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. SETTLEMENT OFFICE OF CONSOLIDATION, AMETHI AND 7 OTHERS

A227/5994/2025 · 2025-09-26

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5994 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while Sri Mohan Singh is present for the Gaon Sabha- respondent No.7. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Settlement Officer of Consolidation, District Amethi to decide appeal No.185 of 2024, new No.167 of 2025 'Ram Anuj and others Vs. Surendra Bahadur Sing and others' under Section 11(1) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Settlement Officer of Consolidation, District Amethi is directed to decide appeal No.185 of 2024, new No.167 of 2025 'Ram Anuj and others Vs. Surendra Bahadur Sing and others' under Section 11(1) of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 expeditiously, say within a period of four months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment. 6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 26, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Singh, Ravi Kant Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Mahendra Bahadur Singh And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Settlement Office Of Consolidation, Amethi And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench