Dudekula. Akbar Basha @ Basha, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/4864/2025 · 2025-05-07
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16815 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16815 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
■ ? IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N I.A.NOs.a AND 4 OF 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4864 OF 2025 Between: Dudekula Akbar Basha @ Basha, S/o.Allisha, aged 26 years, R/o.D.No. 1-7a, Santajurtur Reddy Colony, Band! Atmakur Mandal, Nandyala District. 1. Sesham Jaya Sai Kesava Rao Kesava Rao, S/o.Rambabu, aged 30 years, R/o.2-78, Tarakaturu, Guduru Mandal, Krishna District. 2. ...Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. Through the Station House Officer, Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada, NTR District. 1. ...Respondent/Complainant Singoji Chinnari, D/o.Sigoji Neelaiah, aged 25 years, R/o.D.No.6-54, Alluri
2. Peddagiddada, Reddypeta, Rampachodavaram Mandal Seetharama District. ...Respondent/Defacto-complainant
Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the PRC No.35 of 2024 on the file of the I Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Vijayawada, NTR District against the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2. I-A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in pursuance of PRC No.35 of 2024 on the file of the I Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Vijayawada, NTR District against the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2. I.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Singoji Chinnari, D/o.Sigoji Neelaiah, aged 25 years, R/o.D.No.6-54, Peddagiddada, Reddypeta, Rampachodavaram Mandal, Alluri Seetharama District. ...Petitioner/Respondent No.2/Defacto-complainant AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. Through the Station House Officer, Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada, NTR District. ...Respondent/Complainant
2. Dudekula Akbar Basha @ Basha, S/o.Allisha, aged 26 years, R/o.D.No. 1-7a, Santajurtur Reddy Colony, Bandi Atmakur Mandal, Nandyala District. Sai Kesava Rao Kesava Rao, S/o.Rambabu, aged 30 R/o.2-78, Tarakaturu, Guduru Mandal, Krishna District. ...Respondents/Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2
3. Sesham Jaya years, under Section 359 (6) read with Section 528 of BNSS Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Criminal the High Court may be pleased to permit to compromise the case in the file of the I Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Petition, PRC No.35 of 2024 on Vijayawada.
I.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Between: Singoji Chinnari, D/o.Sigoji Neelaiah, aged 25 years, R/o.D.No.6-54 Peddagiddada, Reddypeta Alluri Mandal, Rampachodavaram Seetharama District. ...Petitioner/Respondent No.2/Defacto-complainant AND of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Pradesh at Amaravati. Through the Station House Officer,
1. The State of Andhra Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada, NTR District. ...Respondent/Complainant
2. Dudekula Akbar Basha @ Basha, S/o.Allisha, aged 26 years, R/o.D.No. Bandi Atmakur Mandal, Nandyala 1-7a, Santajurtur Reddy Colony District. 3. Sesham Jaya Sai Kesava Rao Kesava Rao, S/o.Rambabu, aged 30 , R/o.2-78, Tarakaturu, Guduru Mandal, Krishna District. years ...Respondents/Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2
Petition filed under Section 359 (2) read with Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Criminal ' Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the proceedings in PRC No.35 of 2024 on the file of the I Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Vijayawada. *Joint Compromise Memo enclosed (vide separate sheet) This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Ms. Kotha Veera Naga Pallavi, Advocate for Petitioners and the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of Respondent No.1 and of Sri Advocate for Respondent No.2 The Court made the following: V.Uday Kumar,
APHC010224952025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) • I [3457] 0 THURSDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4864/2025 Between: Dudekula. Akbar Basha @ Basha, and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. KOTHA VEERA NAGA PALLAVI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION N0.4864 of 2025 COMMON ORDER; I The instant petition under Section 528 of Cr.P.C has been filed by the petitioners/Accused Nos.
1 and 2, seeking quashment of the proceedings against them in P.R.C No.35 of 2024 on the file of the I Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Vijayawada, NTR District, for the offences under Sections 70(1), 351 (2) of the BNS,
2. I.A.No.3 of 2025 has been filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner/respondent No.2/De facto complainant, seeking to record a compromise between the parties and to quash the proceedings in P.R.C No.35 of 2024 on the file of the I Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Vijayawada, NTR District. /
3. I.A.No.4 of 2025 has been filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner/respondent No.2/De facto complainant, seeking to compound the offences between the parties and a joint memo was filed. 4. The
learned counsel for the petitioners, the
learned counsel representing the unofficial respondent No.2, and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing respondent No. 1/State are present. Today, when the matter was taken up, both parties appeared
5. before this Court. They produced their respective Aadhar cards as
proof of their identity. The learned
learned counsel for the counsel for the petitioners and the respondents identified the parties in open Court. 6. Since the parties have entered into compromise, the Criminal Petition is allowed, proceedings in P.R.C No.35 of 2024 Judicial Magistrate at Vijayawada, NTR District a settlement and Accordingly, the on the file of the I Additional Chief are hereby quashed. 7. Accordingly, I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 No.4864 of 2025 are allowed. and Criminal Petition As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications shall stand closed. pending, if any ncn.H' ^ D'WAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, T The I Additional District, cfty, KrhhZ District Police Station,
3. One CC to Ms. Kotha Veera Naga Pallavi, Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to Sri V.Uday Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] Irarav"ati[OUT! Andhra
6. Three CD Copies *Joint Compromise Memo BSV Chief Judicial Magistrate at Vijayawada, Krishna Vijayawada Pradesh at enclosed (vide separate sheet) vna
HIGH COURT DATED:08/05/2025 COMMON ORDER I.A.Nos.3 & 4 of 2025 In/And CRLP.No.4864 of 2025 I.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 are ALLOWED ALLOWING CRIMINAL PETITION THE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI I.A.No. of 2Q25 in CrI.P.No. 4864 of 2025 Between;
1. Dudekula Akbar Basha @ Basha, S/o. Allisha Aged 26 Years, R/o. D. No. 1-7a, Santajurtur Reddy colony Band! Atmakur Mandai, Nandyala District
2. Sesham Jaya Sai Kesava Rao Kesava Rao, S/o. Rambabu Aged 30 years, R/o. 2-78, Tarakaturu Guduru Mandai, j<rishna District ...Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 & 2 And
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati . Through the Station House Officer Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada, NTR District ... Respondent/Complainant
2. Singoji Chinnari, D/o. Sigoji Neelaiah Aged 25 Years, R/o. D. No. 6-54, Peddagiddada, Reddypeta Rampachodavaram Mandai, Alluri Seetharama District ... Respondent/Defacto-Complainant JOINT MEMO
1. it is submitted that basing on the report of the 2 nd respondent a case in Crime No. 314 of 2024 of Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada, NTR District was registered for the offence punishable under sections 70 (1), 351 (2) BNS against the petitioners. Subsequently after investigation the 1st respondent filed charge sheet in the said crime and it was taken on file as PRC No. 35 of 2024 on the file of the Hon’ble Additional chief Judicial Magistrate at Vijayawada. Now the petitioners filed the present quash petition praying to quash the proceedings in the above crime. 2.
It is submit that after registration of the above crime, at the intervention of the eiders and well-wishers, the dispute involved in the
above crime was settled out of court. As such, the 2"^ respondent is not interested to prosecute the petitioners herein in the above crime. Hence, petitions are filed praying to permit the parties to compromise the case by recording the compromise arrived at by them. It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the proceedings in PRC No. 35 of 2024 on the file of the Hon’bie Additional chief Judicial Magistrate at Vijayawada and to pass such other ocder or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. D- Petitioner No.1/Accused No.1 S- V C Petitioner No.2/Accused No.2 Counsel for Petitioners Respondent No. 2/De-facto Complainant \)- Counsel for Respondenr No. 2/ De- facto Complainant Amaravathi Date: 01.05.2025