UDAI PRATAP VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/11777/2025 · 2025-10-09
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168146 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168146 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11777 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for the opposite parties.
2. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to authority concerned to consider petitioner's case for payment of regular pension and post-retiral benefits and commutation from the year 1998 as have been granted to similarly situated employee, namely, Smt. Vaishali Saxena, whose services have been regularized alongwith that of petitioner vide order dated
25.09.2012.
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. The Engineer-in-Chief (Design & Planning), Irrigation & Water Resources, Lucknow who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. October 9, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Hayan Hasan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Udai Pratap Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Irrigation And Water Resources Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench