KALEY @ MOHD. SALEEM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/8573/2025 · 2025-10-09
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168143 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168143 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8573 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Mohd. Imran Khan, Advocate on behalf of respondent no. 2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as learned counsel for respondent no. 2 and perused the record. 3. The present application has been filed with a prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 18.09.2019 a well as summoning order dated 04.01.2020 passed in Criminal Case No. 103 of 2020 arising out of Case Crime No. 409 of 2019, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Kaiserganj, District Bahraich as well as its entire proceedings. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and a compromise has been arrived between them on 15.09.2025 (copy of the compromise is appended as Annexure No. 4 to the application). It is further submitted that the original compromise is already filed before the court concerned. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the court below, before which, the case is pending. Therefore, the compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the court below itself. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abdul Alim Khan, Mohd. Vakar Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kaley @ Mohd. Saleem .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Accordingly, the application is disposed of with direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notice to all its signatories requiring their personal presence and thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court concerned and the compromise will be made part of the record. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 7. For a period of six weeks or till the verification of the compromise, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant.
October 9, 2025 VKS A482 No. 8573 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench