SITA RAM RAWAT AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND ANOTHER
A227/6006/2025 · 2025-10-07
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168141 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168141 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6006 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Ram Phal, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Lucknow to decide Appeal/Case No. 24052 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. T 202410460224052) - Sita Ram Rawat and Another Vs. Ram Singh and Others, U/S 35(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Lucknow , considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 2 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Lucknow, is directed to decide -- U/S Appeal/Case No. 24052 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. T 202410460224052) - Sita Ram Rawat and Another Vs. Ram Singh and Others, U/S 35(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
October 7, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Phal, Divya Singh, Neelam Kumari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Sita Ram Rawat And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench