Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12903 WP No. 42280 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 42280 OF 2016 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. A. VIJAYAMMA WIFE OF NARAYANA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.614, BASAVANAGUDI ROAD, CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK AND DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. T SRINIVASAN., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHIKKABALLAPUR SUB DIVISION, CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK AND DISTRICT-562101. 2. THE TASILDHAR CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK AND DISTRICT-562101. 3. SRI. BABU ISMAIL SON OF KASIM, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 461/1, 1ST FLOOR, 3RD CROSS, M.M. LAYOUT, KAVAL BYRASANDRA, R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032. 4. SRI. RAMANJANI SON OF LATE BACHANNA,
Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12903 WP No. 42280 of 2016
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1009, 1ST CROSS, KAVAL BYRASANDRA, NEW LAYOUT, BEHIND P & T, R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 032. 5. SRI. S. NARAYANA SWAMY SON OF LATE MUNISWAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 614, BASAVANAGUDI ROAD, CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK AND DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA., AGA FOR R-1 & R-2;
SRI. KARTHIK.R., FOR SRI. T.K.RAJAGOPALA., ADVOCATE FOR R-3;
R-4 & R-5 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS.QUASH THE ORDER DATED: 4.11.2015, IN THE PROCEEDING BEARING L & DRA 19/2015-16 ON THE FILE OF THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, CHIKKABALLAPUR SUB DIVISION, CHIKKABALLAPUR, VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:12903 WP No. 42280 of 2016
ORAL ORDER
1. This writ petition is filed challenging the order by which the interim order was vacated and which has been passed by the Assistant Commissioner. 2. The learned counsel for respondent No.3 submits that the main matter, which was pending before the Assistant Commissioner has itself been disposed of on 19.07.2017. 3. Since the main matter itself is disposed of, the prayers in this writ petition relating to interim order would not survive for consideration. 4. The writ petition is therefore dismissed as having become infructuous. 5.
In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE RK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50