Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1681 (UTT)

NAVEEN CHANDRA PANERU v. State Of Uttarakhand

WPSB/395/2016 · 2025-07-15

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPSB No.395 of 2016 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. K.N. Joshi, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State. 3. Ms. Menka Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 4. Learned counsel for petitioners makes a statement at Bar that the writ petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time. 5. Owing to this statement made by learned counsel for petitioners, writ petition is dismissed as infructous. (Subhash Upadhyay,J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 15.07.2025 SS