Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 168092 (ALL)

AJAY KUMAR @ AJAY RAMPRASAD KESHARWANI v. TAHSILDAR, TAHSIL KUNDA, PRATAPGARH AND 3 OTHERS

A227/5934/2025 · 2025-09-26

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5934 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent while notice on behalf of respondent No.2- Gaon Sabha has been accepted by Sri Pankaj Gupta. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil- Kunda, District Pratapgarh to decide case No.240/2007-2008 under Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, titled as "Ajay Kumar Vs. Bachchu Lal", expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil- Kunda, District Pratapgarh is directed to decide case No.240/2007-2008 under Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, titled as "Ajay Kumar Vs. Bachchu Lal" , expeditiously, say within a period of three months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment. 6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Govind Kumar Pandey, Anand Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Ramprasad Kesharwani .....Petitioner(s) Tahsildar, Tahsil Kunda, Pratapgarh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 26, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 5934 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench