Liak Ram (since deceased) through his L.Rs vs. Jeetu and others. CMP(M) No.1760 of 2024. 07.03.2025. Present: None for the applicant. Mr.K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Advocate for the non-applicant(s). A perusal of order sheets shows that presence of the counsel(s) in the instant case has not been marked correctly. Once the proceedings under Order 39 Rule 2-A read with Section 151 CPC are registered separately, then the parties therein have to be reflected as applicants and respondents. In the instant case, the proceedings have been initiated by Liak Ram who was then represented by Sh. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, whereas the respondents are being represented by Sh. K.D. Sood, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sh. Sanjeev Sood and Sh. Het Ram, Advocates, respectively. However, the presence of Sh. K.D. Sood, learned Senior Advocate alongwith Sh. Het Ram, Advocate has been marked on behalf of the applicant and the presence of Sh. Bhupinder Gupta, learned Senior Advocate alongwith Mr. Pranjal Munjal and Ms. Rinki Kashmiri, Advocates has been marked for respondents. Such presence is ordered to be corrected accordingly. Today, no one has appeared on behalf of the applicants, therefore, this court is left with no other option but to dismiss this application for want of prosecution Ordered accordingly. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge March 07, 2025. (y.s)