Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16808 (GAU)

RUNGAJAUN TEA AND PLANTATION INDUSTRIES PVT LTD v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Civil)/2424/2025 · 2025-08-27

Michael Zothankhuma

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010167722025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2424/2025 RUNGAJAUN TEA AND PLANTATION INDUSTRIES PVT LTD A COMPANY DULY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT KHETAN BHAWAN, SEUNI ALI, A.T. ROAD, P.O. AND DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM AND IS REPRESENTED BY ONE OF ITS DULY AUTHORIZED DIRECTOR, MR. BASANT KUMAR KHETAN, SON OF MURIL DHAR KHETAN. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, LABOUR WELFARE DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006. 2:THE ASSAM TEA EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION REP. BY ITS SECRETARY CUM PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER NIDHI BHAWAN LALMATI NH-37 BASISTHA GUWAHATI- 781029 ASSAM. 3:THE RECOVERY OFFICER ASSAM TEA EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION GOLAGHAT ZONE NIDHI BHAWAN AMOLAPATTY P.O. AND DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM- 785621. 4:DIRECTORATE OF LAND REQUISITIONS ACQUISITIONS AND REFORMS REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR OF LAND REQUISITION ACQUISITION AND REFORMS Page No.# 2/2 ASSAM RAJAH BHAWAN (2ND FLOOR) ROOPNAGAR GUWAHATI- 781032 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M SAHEWALLA, MS T J SAHEWALLA,MS. S. TODI,MR G N SAHEWALLA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. R SHARMA, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER 28.08.2025 Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the order dated 18.07.2025 passed in WP(C) 3238/2025 should be modified, so as to substitute the reference made to the “Chairman of the Board of Trustees” with the “Authorized Officer”. He also submits that the applicant has paid Rs.25,00,000/- yesterday, which is in consonance with the order dated 18.07.2025 passed in WP(C) 3238/2025. As such Rs. 1.00 crore has been paid as on date. Mr. R. Sharma, learned counsel appears for the respondent nos.2 and 3 submits that he has got no objection to the application being allowed. Accordingly, wherever it is mentioned in the order dated 18.07.2025 passed in WP(C) 3238/2025 as “Chairman of the Board of Trustees”, the same should be read as “Authorized Officer”. The application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant