GAJENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/9453/2025 · 2025-09-26
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168069 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 168069 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9453 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Vivek Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Jayant Singh Tomar, learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.248 of 2024, under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61 of BNS & Sections 13(1), 13(5) of Public Examination Act, registered at Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Balrampur. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on25.08.2024 stating that in police recruitment Examination, one Bhagwan Singh was appearing in place of the applicant. Another persons Govind Singh was implicated as an accomplice of Bhagwan Singh. Although the F.I.R. mentions that Bhagwan Singh was appearing in place of the applicant, the applicant has not been arrayed as an accused in the F.I.R.
4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent young man aged 23 years, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. 5. Both the name accused persons Bhagwan Singh and Govind Singh have been granted bail in the present case. Copies of their bail orders have been annexed with the bail application. 5. Learned A.G.A.-I has opposed the bail application and he has submitted that the investigation in the present case is still going on. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vivek Pandey, Arpit Gupta, Jyotika Yog Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Gajendra Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
keeping in view the fact that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R.; that the both the named accused persons have already been granted bail and that the applicant is a young man aged 23 years, having no criminal history, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 8.
Let the applicant - Gajendra Singh be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 26, 2025 S. Shivhare BAIL No. 9453 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench