Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010168152022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5501/2022 RUPSHI DAOBHANGI JUNIOR COLLEGE AND 9 ORS P.O- RUPSHI, DIST- DHUBRI, PIN-783331, ASSAM, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL NAZMUL HOQUE 2: NAZMUL HAQUE S/O- LATE SAMER ALI R/O- VILLAGE BHELAKOBA P.O- KHUDIMARI P.S- GAURIPUR DIST- DHUBRI PIN-783331 ASSAM 3: ENAMUL HOQUE S/O- LATE UMED ALI R/O- VILLAGE SAJUARKUTI P.O- SILAIRPUAR DIST- DHUBRI PIN-783331 ASSAM 4: MATIYAR RAHMAN S/O- LATE FAZLE RAHMAN R/O- VILLAGE SHERNAGAR Page No.# 2/4 P.O- BELGURI DIST- DHUBRI PIN-783334 ASSAM 5: ABDUL QUDDUS S/O- LATE ABDUR RAHMAN R/O- VILLAGE CHAPGARH PART-II P.O- KHUDIMARI DIST- DHUBRI PIN-783331 ASSAM 6: KAMAL HOSSAIN S/O- LATE ABBAS ALI R/O- VILLAGE DAFARPUR P.O- DAFARPUR DIST- DHUBRI PIN-783334 ASSAM 7: SHERAJUL HOQUE S/O- LATE SAWKAT ALI R/O- VILLAGE KALDOBA PART II P.O- AGOMANI DIST- DHUBRI PIN-783335 ASSAM 8: MOSTAFA HUSSAIN PRODHANI S/O- LATE SAHIR UDDIN PRODHANI R/O- VILLAGE OXIGURI P.O- TAMARHAT DIST- DHUBRI PIN-783332 Page No.# 3/4 ASSAM 9: KAMRUZZAMAN ABDUR RASHID S/O- LATE AKBAR ALI SARKAR R/O- VILLAGE KALDOBA PART II P.O- AGOMANI DIST- DHUBRI PIN-783335 ASSAM 10: ABDULLAH MIAH S/O- LATE RAFIQUL ISLAM R/O- VILLAGE MUSALMANPARA P.O- TAMARHAT DIST- DHUBRI PIN-783333 ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006. 2:THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI- 781019. 3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U K NAIR, MR B CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SEC. EDU., SC, FINANCE Page No.# 4/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 04-06-2025 Shri B. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are subsequent developments which would indicate that the grievance of the petitioner would be considered for redressal by the authorities and to facilitate such process, he prays for withdrawal of this writ petition. However, he hastens to add that liberty may be granted, in case the grievance is not redressed. Shri B. Kaushik, the learned Standing Counsel, Secondary Education does not object to the said prayer. In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant