Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16803 (RAJ)

MONU KUMAR S/O DEVI SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5550/2025 · 2025-06-12

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23153] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5550/2025 Monu Kumar S/o Devi Singh, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Kheda Kurtan, Tehsil Kerana, Police Station Kandhla, District Shamli, Uttar Pradesh (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan through the PP ----Non-Petitioner For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aayush Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 12/06/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 40/2025 registered at Police Station GRP Ajmer, Ajmer for the offence(s) under Sections 8/15 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that the applicant is sole bread earner for his family and is aged about 36 years. It is further submitted that challan has been filed and the applicant is behind the bars since 04.04.2025. It is further submitted that there is one criminal antecedent pending against the applicant however, the same does not pertain to the NDPS Act. Nevertheless, the quantity of contraband that is recovered from [2025:RJ-JP:23153] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5550/2025] the applicant is around 32 Kgs of Doda Chura, which is less than commercial quantity. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, taking note of the fact that quantity recovered is less than commercial quantity; that challan has been filed; that trial will take time and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Monu Kumar S/o Devi Singh shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/106